1. Do you favour keeping the existing system of electing city government in Vancouver, with no change? If you do not favour keeping the current system, what changes would you advocate if elected?
I would like the election of the mayor to be done in two rounds, with the first round to eliminate all except the top two candidates w/ the most # of votes. This would enhance voters to vote for their first choices of candidates instead of worrying too much about politics.
2. How important is it to you that Vancouver's voting system should include a degree of neighbourhood representation, that is that different parts of the city should vote separately for candidates representing their area?
It is important to be elected at-large for the City, because we have neighbourhood representation already in the two other senior levels of governments. Other than the "diversity of representatives", with the local at-large and seniors at wards, we need to have councillors those are representing the interests of the city as a whole.
3. How important is it to you that Vancouver's voting system should include a degree of proportional representation, that is that minority views of Vancouverites should be represented on council in relation to the number of voters who express them?
Proportional representation is totally different with the ward system. There is a big flaw with proportional system because it may get too political "within" parties itself. It limits the chances for individual candidates to speak out their individual opinions, thus limiting the diversity of voices. I would rather keep the current system.
Thanks,
Raymond Chang
Nov 8, 2002